Legal Opinion

Yost v. American Overseas Marine Corp.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided July 15, 1992No. 2:91cv820PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAYNE, District Judge.

In this action based solely on diversity jurisdiction, the plaintiff, Kerwin A. Yost (“Yost”), asserts two causes of action both of which are said to arise under the general admiralty laws of the United States, as well as under all other laws of the United States and unspecified state law. At oral argument, counsel for Yost explained that Yost’s admiralty causes of action were for breach of the warranty of seaworthiness and negligence; conceded that there were no state law claims; and advised that the only other possible claim might be under the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boyett v. Keene Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1993
  2. Lewis v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API