Legal Opinion

Cauldwell v. Erie Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

On the 18th day of January, 1938, an order was entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, by Hon. S. H. West, United States District Judge, pursuant to a petition of the Erie Railroad Company to operate under section 77 of the Bankruptcy Act (U. S. Code, tit. 11, § 205). Paragraph 8 of the aforesaid order which is based upon subdivision (j) of section 77 of the Bankruptcy Act (U. S. Code, tit. 11, § 205, subd. [j]), provides in effect that no suits can be commenced or continued against the debtor, except suits or claims for damages caused…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Liquid Carbonic Corp. v. Erie RailroadCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939
  2. Haberern v. Lehigh & New England Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Boylan v. NashNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  4. Hisey v. Reading Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API