Legal Opinion

People v. Fultz

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1988No. 86CA0275PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

METZGER, Judge.

The defendant, Robert Eugene Fultz, appeals judgments of conviction for kidnapping and sexual assault, entered upon jury verdicts. He argues that the trial court erred (1) in denying his challenge for cause of a prospective juror; (2) in limiting cross-examination of the complaining witness, thereby restricting his constitutional right to confrontation; and (3) in refusing to suppress a 1979 Illinois rape conviction which the prosecution intended to use for impeachment if the defendant testified. We affirm.

I

We reject defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in denying…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. RubanowitzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. People v. RussoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. People v. GermanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Craig v. RiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. Farmers Insurance Gr. v. District Court of SEC. JDSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. MershonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. People v. AsberryColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. MershonColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. People v. RoweColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API