Legal Opinion

In re Graham

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2002No. 01-BG-1438PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”), on review of a Hearing Committee’s report, has concluded that respondent Anthony Graham, Sr., violated Rules 1.15(a) and 1.17(a) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct in each of three separate cases by depositing client funds into his operating account rather than a trust account. Additionally, the Board found that respondent violated Rule 1.15(b) in one of those cases by failing to promptly disburse from settlement proceeds a payment due a third' party. The commingling occurred during the period of March 1997 through…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re TeitelbaumDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re BettisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API