Legal Opinion

Willows Cattle Co. v. Connell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1923No. Civil No. 2098PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLyman, J.

This is a forcible entry and detainer proceeding to recover possession of an eighty-acre tract of public land. A jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The appeal is based upon the instructions given to the jury. The court was asked to direct a verdict for the plaintiff, and the refusal to do so is assigned as error. Plaintiff claims that the undisputed testimony entitled it to a verdict, because it showed that at the time of defendant’s entry, which was admitted, the premises were in the possession of the plaintiff. "Whether or not the plaintiff, at the time of the entry, was in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . NewburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crismon v. ChristmannArizona Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API