Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Lensing
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided January 16, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 89-3227PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
MENTZ, District Judge.
This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate for the purpose of conducting hearings, including evidentiary hearings, if necessary, and submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (c), and, as applicable, Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.
Upon a review of the record, including the state court record submitted by the respondent, the Court has determined that it is sufficient for the purpose of adjudication of petitioner’s claims, that a federal evidentiary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roderick Wilson v. C.M. Lensing and Attorney General of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991