Legal Opinion
United States v. Edwards
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided April 14, 2011No. 5:08-hc-02095PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TERENCE WILLIAM BOYLE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court regarding Respondent’s objection at a March 29, 2011 status conference regarding Defendant’s failure to disclose an expert report favorable to the Respondent. The Court finds that the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause requires application of the Brady Doctrine in § 4248 cases.
The Court also DENIES the Respondent’s Motion for Appointment of Expert and Memorandum Addressing the Payment of the Court’s Expert. (DE # 51). The Court additionally DENIES Respondent’s Motion to Withdraw this Motion and Memorandum (DE # 59).
I.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Faisal Nabin Kashem v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Brodie v. Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. Edgar SearcyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States of America v. the Project on Government OversightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. EbelDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.