Legal Opinion

United States v. Edgar Searcy

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 18, 2018No. 16-6833PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIAZ, Circuit Judge:

Edgar Joe Searcy appeals his civil commitment under the Adam Walsh Act, 18 U.S.C;- § 4248, He does not challenge the factual findings of the district court, but rather urges us to hold that the government initiated this civil commitment proceeding after the' applicable statute of limitations had lapsed. Searcy argues that the four-year “catch-all” statute of limitations Congress enacted for civil actions, see 28 U.S.C. § 1658(a), applies to civil .commitment proceedings under the Adam Walsh Act. Thus, says Searcy, by not filing a certification until more than a decade…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wendall Jermaine Hall v. Lieutenant Peter MerolaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
  2. State of Iowa v. Lloyd AschbrennerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  3. United States v. Sean WaydaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  4. Gerald Timms v. U. S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  5. United States v. James VandivereCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API