Legal Opinion
Rucker v. Tietz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 20, 1962No. 39865PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
The defendant in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, filed his petition against defendant alleging that he purchased on July 29, 1959, thirty-five head of “springer heifers” from the defendant by written contract; that defendant expressly represented and warranted orally that said heifers had been bred to an Angus bull and would calve from October 10th to about December 15, 1959; that such representations were false and that only three of such heifers calved and none showed indications of being bred to an angus bull.
Upon trial to the jury, plaintiff recovered a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boggs v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Johnson v. EagleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Halsell v. First Nat. Bank of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Varn v. MaloneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Denning v. Bolin Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Lenn v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- White v. BergerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- S. G. Denning, W. N. Denning, and M. T. Matthews v. Bolin Oil Company, a Partnership Composed of D. Huston Bolin, D. Phil Bolin, Robert L. Bolin, and C. W. Bolin, C. W. Stradley, Third-Party v. Frank Griggs, Bolin Oil Company, a Partnership Composed of D. Huston Bolin, D. Phil Bolin, Robert L. Bolin, and C. W. Bolin, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970