E.T. Horn Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
I. Introduction
BARZILAY, Judge:
The court has before it Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment under USCIT Rule 56 and Defendant’s Cross-Motion. The issue in this case is the proper classification of dichloroethyl ether (“DCEE”), a chemical compound imported by Plaintiff, E.T. Horn Company (“Horn”). The United States Customs Service (“Customs”) classified the product as an ether of monohydric alcohol, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) subheading 2909.19.1090, at duty rates of 5.5 percent and 5.6 percent. Plaintiff contends that DCEE should be classified as a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.