Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cohen
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:
The issue presented in this appeal is whether arbitrators or courts decide the timeliness of claims sought to be arbitrated pursuant to the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) Code of Arbitration. We hold that the court determines whether a claim is timely; accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND.
I
Between 1985 and 1987, Simon and Judith Cohen (the “Cohens”) purchased limited partnership interests from David Sanford, a financial consultant with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith (“Merrill Lynch”). The Cohens and Merrill Lynch entered into a Customer…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Painewebber Incorporated v. Mohamad S. Elahi, Kokab Moarefi Elahi and Maryam ElahiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,173, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 2803 Kevin Miller v. Dr. Charles W. FlumeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Prudential Securities, Inc. v. EmersonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- Amtower v. William C Roney & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Weston Securities Corp. v. AykanianMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.