Legal Opinion
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1998No. Nos. 96-2204, 96-2410PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves a dispute among an American Indian tribe, the federal government and the State of Michigan regarding the applicability of a particular provision of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., to Indian gaming that is the subject of a tribal-state gaming compact. The district court concluded that the IGRA provision at issue, 25 U.S.C. § 2719, does not apply to gaming that is the subject of a valid tribal-state compact, one of the means of regulating Indian gaming created by the IGRA The federal defendants-appellants,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McCARTHY v. RECORDEX SERVICE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Pueblo of Santa Ana v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Artichoke Joe's v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002
- Grand Traverse Band Of Ottawa And Chippewa Indians v. Office Of The U.S. Attorney For The Western District Of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.