Legal Opinion

W. X. Huber Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 24, 1947No. 51855; protest 953440-G (Los Angeles)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

This is a suit against the United States arising at the port of Los Angeles in which the plaintiff seeks to recover a portion of the duty assessed upon preserved pineapples packed in cans. Duty was assessed under the provisions of paragraph 747, Tariff Act of 1930, as “Pineapples * * * otherwise prepared or preserved, and not specially provided for, 2 cents per pound.” The collector based his assessment upon a net weight of 24,300 pounds. The plaintiff claims that duty should have been assessed on the basis of the actual weight of the pineapples, exclusive of the sirup.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stokby v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  2. Peabody v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Edenfruit Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  4. Johnson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API