Legal Opinion

Davis v. Clark

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1937No. 6881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Hickman

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

In the trial court defendant in error Clark was awarded damages for personal injuries against A. A. Davis and E. D. Davis, composing the partnership of A. A. Davis & Company, and G. F. Mordah, an employee of the partnership. E. E. Davis was named as a defendant, but was dismissed from the case on his own motion after all the evidence was introduced. The damages were the result of an alleged unlawful assault made upon Clark by Mordah. The trial court’s judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 78 S. W.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. McLeanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Winters Mut. Aid Ass'n Circle No. 2 v. ReddinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Mayfield Co. v. PepperTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. v. SalsmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Davis v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. RingoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Lachalet International, Inc. v. Nowik, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  3. Greathouse v. Texas Public Utilities Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Breeding v. NalerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Jax Beer Co. v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API