Curry v. City of Kenova
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lively, Judge:
These two cases involve the validity of street paving assessments against each of the plaintiffs by the city of Kenova.
The city inaugurated a program of street paving under its charter, chapter 16, Acts of 1927. Plaintiff Bush owned lot 16 in block 85, and improvements were made on the two streets abutting this lot, and the assessments against it aggregated $1,065.02. Plaintiff Curry also owned a corner lot, the two streets on which it abutted were improved, and the assessments against his lot aggregated $1,062.33. Each of plaintiff’s aver that their respective assessments are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Ft. Dodge Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Ft. DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of HarrisburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894
- City of Enid v. Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Moundsville v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
- United States v. City of CharlestonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1950
- Burgess v. City of CameronWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932