Legal Opinion
In Re Nyfix, Inc. Derivative Litigation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 25, 2008No. Master File 3:06cv01320 (AWT)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Andrew Brock (“Brock”) and James Cattelona (“Cattelona”), on behalf on nominal defendant NYFIX, Inc. (“NYFIX”), bring this shareholder derivative action against certain of NYFIX’s current and former officers and directors. Defendants NYFIX, George Deehan, William Lynch, William Jennings, Peter Hansen, and Thomas Wajnert have moved to dismiss this action. For the reasons set forth below, their motions to dismiss are being granted.
I. BACKGROUND
On December 19, 2006, the plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Verified…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Desimone v. BarrowsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- Ryan v. GiffordCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- Braddock v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Plymouth County Retirement Ass'n v. SchroederDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Barenbaum v. FTE Networks, IncDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- In re Bofi Holding, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
- In re Nutanix, Inc. Stockholder Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- THIEFFRY v. WALDISDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021