Legal Opinion

Kingman & Co. v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 15, 1898No. 702PublishedCited by 6 opinions

^rror from Marion district court; O. L. Moore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schoonover, J.:

In 1895 M. A. Carter, defendant in error, was married to N. J. Shallenbarger. Before her marriage she deeded her homestead to her prospective husband. On the 19th day of December, 1896, on account of the cruelties of her husband, she was granted a divorce and alimony. The following appears in the journal entry ;

“And it is further considered, ordered and adjudged that said defendant do pay to said plaintiff as alimony in said cause the sum of $1000, out of the defendant’s property, for the support and maintenance of said plaintiff, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Romaine v. . ChaunceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bensel v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Anich v. AnichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Malone v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Bradford Furniture Co. v. Storey (In re Storey)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1994
  5. Stott v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API