Legal Opinion
Metcalf v. Leedy, Wheeler & Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided September 29, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. —
This appeal is taken from a-final decree of the chancellor irx the Ninth Judicial Circuit, dismissing a bill of complaint filed by H. W. Metcalf against appellees.
Mr. Metcalf is 75 years of age, and is now engaged in operating an orange grove near Orlando. He had, before Prohibition, been engaged in the whisky business; and now owns considerable bonds and other investment property.
F. Monroe Alleman is secretary-treasurer and Paul W. McKee is a salesman of appellee corporation, and all are engaged in business as investment bankers in Orlando. They had, previous to the transaction…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Beach v. WiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Beare v. J.A. WrightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Hensan v. CookseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Firestone v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Barnett Bank of West Florida v. HooperSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Lanz v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Auto Dealers Group v. Auto Dealer Services, Inc. (In Re Auto Dealer Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.