Legal Opinion

Bell v. Bell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1942No. 13993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Obice, Justice.

1. The attack, made for the first time in the bill of exceptions, that the decision excepted to was void because its effect was to deprive the plaintiffs in error of vested contract and property rights, privileges, and immunities and therefore in violation of paragraph 5 of section 1 of article 12 of the constitution of this State, is not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction of the writ of error. Paragraph 5 of section 2 of article 6 of the constitution; Felker v. Still, 176 Ga. 735 (169 S. E. 15); Silas v. State, 181 Ga. 744 (184 S. E. 318); Bentley v. Anderson-McGriff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bentley v. Anderson-McGriff Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Forrester v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Felker v. StillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. Silas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. PACE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. Houdaille-Duval-Wright Division, Houdaille Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Aiken v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API