Legal Opinion

Wayne County Prosecutor v. Kinney

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 1990No. Docket 114323PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action brought pursuant to § 4 of the incompatible offices act, MCL 15.181 et seq.; MSA 15.1120(121) et seq. Defendant James Kinney (hereinafter defendant) appeals as of right from an order finding that he holds two incompatible public offices and granting summary disposition in favor of plaintiff. We affirm.

Defendant serves both as a member of the City of Woodhaven City Council and as a paid volunteer fire fighter for the Woodhaven Fire Department. The collective bargaining agreement between the city and the Woodhaven Firefighters Association sets forth the terms and conditions of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Contesti v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. MacOmb County Prosecutor v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. MacOmb County Prosecutor v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Detroit Area Agency on Aging v. Office of Services to the AgingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. City of Sturgis v. KochSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Kleinjans v. KorpakDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API