United States v. McCullough
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Defendants have moved for dismissal of this indictment. They allege two grounds for the dismissal: 1) that the indictment does not charge a federal crime under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951; and 2) that their Fifth Amendment rights were violated by pre-indictment delay. For reasons stated below, this motion must be denied, but defendants may renew their claims at the close of the government’s case.
Federal Offense: The Hobbs Act
Defendants first argue that there is no basis for federal jurisdiction since the indictment fails to state a violation of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. EnmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Alexander J. BarketCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BloomDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- California Licensed Vocational Nurses, Inc. v. N. L. R. BCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976