Legal Opinion

United States v. McCullough

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 15, 1977No. Crim. 76-413PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEWCOMER, District Judge.

Defendants have moved for dismissal of this indictment. They allege two grounds for the dismissal: 1) that the indictment does not charge a federal crime under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951; and 2) that their Fifth Amendment rights were violated by pre-indictment delay. For reasons stated below, this motion must be denied, but defendants may renew their claims at the close of the government’s case.

Federal Offense: The Hobbs Act

Defendants first argue that there is no basis for federal jurisdiction since the indictment fails to state a violation of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. EnmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. Alexander J. BarketCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BloomDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. California Licensed Vocational Nurses, Inc. v. N. L. R. BCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API