Legal Opinion
Commonwealth, Office of Attorney General Ex Rel. Corbett v. Lower Oxford Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 12, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge FRIEDMAN.
Before this court are the preliminary objections filed by Lower Oxford Township and the Lower Oxford Township Board of Supervisors (Lower Oxford) in response to the Petition for Review (Petition) filed in this court’s original jurisdiction by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of Attorney General By Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Attorney General (Attorney General). We sustain Lower Oxford’s preliminary objections and dismiss the Petition without prejudice.
Chapter three of the Agricultural Code (ACRE), 3 Pa.C.S. §§ 311-318, which took effect July 6, 2005, deals with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arsenal Coal Co. v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ResourcesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Hydropress Environmental Services, Inc. v. Township of Upper Mount BethelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Rouse & Associates—Ship Road Land Ltd. Partnership v. Pennsylvania Environmental Quality BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. Board of ClaimsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Com. Office of Atty. Gen. Ex Rel. Corbett v. Locust Tp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth, Office of Attorney General Ex Rel. Corbett v. Locust TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Com. Office of Atty. Gen. Ex Rel. Corbett v. Locust Tp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009