Legal Opinion

Scates v. Board of Com'rs of Union City

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1954PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*276Mr. Justice Tomlinson

delivered the opinion of the Court..

An automobile belonging to the municipality of Union City, Tennessee, while being driven over the streets of that town, came into collision with an automobile belonging to plaintiff-in-error, Charles Scates. The Board of Commissioners of Union City, being of the opinion that the collision was due to the negligence of Scates, brought suit against Scates to obtain a judgment for the damage done to the automobile. Scates was of the opinion that the collision was brought about by the negligence of the driver of the city’s automobile. Hence,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Moore v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Quinton v. Board of ClaimsTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Combs v. City of ElizabethtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hill v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Brewington v. BrewingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Davidson v. Lewis Bros. BakeryTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Crowe v. John W. Harton Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API