Van Bokkelen v. Travelers' Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy on agreed facts in an action by 'Caroline B. Van Bokkelen against the Travelers’ Insurance Company of Hartford. Judgment for defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.
This is a submission of a controversy on an agreed statement of facts, and the question presented is as to the liability of the defendant under a policy of insurance by which the defendant agreed to insure one Spencer D. C. Van Bokkelen against injuries resulting “through external, violent, and accidental means,” *308and which provided that, if “death results from such injuries alone, within ninety days, will pay ten thousand dollars to Caroline B. Van Bokkelen, his daughter”; with the further provision that, “if such injuries are sustained while riding as a passenger in any passenger conveyance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Ætna Life Ins. v. VandecarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of LaudyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Northrup v. . the Railway Passenger As. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- London Assurance Corp. v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sant v. Continental Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Wilmarth v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Depue v. Travelers' Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. RustTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- Perry v. North American Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.