Legal Opinion
Cummings v. Societe Suisse Pour Valeurs De Metaux
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 8, 1936No. 6643PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRONER, Associate Justice.
For convenience we shall call appellants (the Attorney General and Treasurer), the Custodian, and appellee (Societe Suisse), the corporation. The latter filed its bill under section 9 of the Trading with the Enemy Act 1 to recover from the Custodian further moneys in addition to moneys and properties previously paid over and transferred to it pursuant, to an earlier claim filed by it under the same section of the act. In its bill the corporation alleged that it had never been an enemy of the United States within the meaning of the Trading with the Enemy Act; that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. Bank of the MetropolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Wilber Nat. Bank of Oneonta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Becker Steel Co. of America v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Banco Mexicano De Commercio E Industria v. Deutsche BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. SillimanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Vestal v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Isenberg v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Pflueger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Societe Suisse Pour Valeurs De Metaux v. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.