Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Daniel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 8, 1926No. 6 Div. 504PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The bill is to enforce a vendor’s lien upon lands. The issue here presented is payment.

In 1S99 Mrs. D. E. Daniel conveyed the tract of land to her son, Barnett Daniel, reserving its use and enjoyment during her life. Barnett was then a mere lad. On his arrival of age, in 1911, W. J. Daniel, his brother. 16 years older, purchased Barnett’s title and interest. The deed was executed to Minnie Daniel, wife of W. J. Daniel, reciting the consideration of $1,000 paid by her, receipt acknowledged.

Some years thereafter Barnett and his mother joined in a bill to cancel the deed for fraud, undue…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cook v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Pylant v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  3. Moore v. WorthySupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Daniel v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Kelly v. KarsnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bishop v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Boger v. Jones Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Ayers v. AyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API