Senior Citizens Coalition v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The pivotal issues in' this case are: (1) whether the commission lawfully exercised its discretion in refusing to grant North Shore Alert’s petition for leave to intervene and in granting limited intervention to the remaining three appellants and (2) whether the commission’s distribution of the revenue increase among the various CEI customer classes is amply supported by the record.
In the joint petition for leave to intervene, North Shore Alert alleged that it was a greater Cleveland area safe energy group which operates by “protesting the use of nuclear energy.” Indeed, appellants’ brief to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Dworken v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006