Legal Opinion

Shapro v. Forsythe

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1987No. 18151PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Because we conclude that genuine issues of fact remain for trial, we reverse.

Appellants Robert and Pauline Shapro filed a complaint in the district court stating four causes of action against respondents. In the complaint, appellants alleged that Robert Shapro, James Forsythe, Merle Bruce and their wives had formed a partnership in 1986 for the purpose of operating a medical laboratory. Each couple had contributed $20,000 to the partnership as initial capital. Robert Shapro had performed services over a three-month-period for which he had been…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Nehls v. LeonardNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Zuni Construction Co. v. Great American InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hoffmeister Cabinets of Nevada, Inc. v. BivinsNevada Supreme Court · 1971

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Torres v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Maine v. StewartNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Boulder City v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. FERGASON VS. LV METRO POLICE DEPT.Nevada Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API