Shapro v. Forsythe
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Because we conclude that genuine issues of fact remain for trial, we reverse.
Appellants Robert and Pauline Shapro filed a complaint in the district court stating four causes of action against respondents. In the complaint, appellants alleged that Robert Shapro, James Forsythe, Merle Bruce and their wives had formed a partnership in 1986 for the purpose of operating a medical laboratory. Each couple had contributed $20,000 to the partnership as initial capital. Robert Shapro had performed services over a three-month-period for which he had been…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Nehls v. LeonardNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Zuni Construction Co. v. Great American InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Hoffmeister Cabinets of Nevada, Inc. v. BivinsNevada Supreme Court · 1971
4Cited by9 opinions
- Torres v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Maine v. StewartNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Boulder City v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
- FERGASON VS. LV METRO POLICE DEPT.Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.