Legal Opinion

In re Disbarment of Gorsuch

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1923No. 24,440PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This is an original proceeding to disbar H. F. Gorsuch, an attorney at law in Wyandotte county.

*381One of the charges against the accused is that he “employed certain solicitors and agents commonly known as ‘snitches’ to secure business for him.”

Honorable R. M. Hamer, of Emporia, the commissioner appointed by the court to take the evidence and make findings of fact and conclusions of law, finds:

“That in his work in soliciting and securing causes of action and claims he violates all of the ethical standards of lawyers, and is guilty of what is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re the Disbarment of SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Farlin v. SookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. In re Proceedings to PeytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  4. In re the Disbarment of WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. In re Disbarment of MacySupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. Martin v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Boynton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. In Re the Accusation for Disbarment of RatnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API