Legal Opinion

Tatum v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 11, 1944No. 10616PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the appellant by the District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division, and a jury thereof.

Appellant, one of Mankind United’s associates, was convicted in the court below under an indictment for a violation of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 301 et seq.

In the court below and before the Selective Service Agencies, he claimed to be a minister and that he was entitled to a classification as such under the Selective Training and Service Act.

Bagley v. United States,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Billings v. TruesdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Bagley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. EstepCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  2. Commers v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1946
  3. United States v. George William CrockerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. DooresDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1945
  5. United States v. EstepCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API