DeRolph v. State

Upon consideration of appellees’ “Motion for Reconsideration and Clarification,” we find that appellees’ motion raises three questions:

1. May local property taxes be used as any part of a funding solution?

2. Do debt obligations for school funding incurred before March 24, 1998, pursuant to state law, remain valid even though repayment provisions extend beyond March 24,1998?

3. Should this court retain exclusive jurisdiction of the case to review all remedial legislation enacted in response to the court’s decision?

I

May local property taxes be used as any part of a funding solution? The answer…