Legal Opinion

Tom Franklin Morris v. Roberto Ortiz

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 6, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00582Unknown

1Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-00582-DMG-RAO Document 33 Filed 05/06/22 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:127 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TOM FRANKLIN MORRIS, Case No. CV 21-00582-DMG (RAO) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT 14 ROBERTO ORTIZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 On January 20, 2021, Plaintiff Tom Franklin Morris (“Plaintiff”) filed a 19 Complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). Dkt. No. 20 1. On May 17, 2021, the Court directed service of process by the United States 21 Marshal (“USM”). Dkt. Nos.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API