Legal Opinion
Maher v. Herrman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 28, 2002No. 2-00-404-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice.
Introduction
The Maher Law Firm and Constance Maher sued Regina Elkins, a former employee, to collect on an alleged loan and for slander, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and civil conspiracy. In the same action, Maher lodged slander, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and civil conspiracy claims against David E. Herr-man and Herrman & Herrman, L.L.P., Elkins’s present employers. The trial court entered an order granting defendants’ summary judgment on the slander, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and civil conspiracy…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gillig v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Torres v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Diamond v. Eighth Avenue 92, L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Sammy Burchinal and Ashley Burchinal v. PJ Trailers-Seminole Management Company, LLC Texmecana Management, LLC And PJ Trailers Manufacturing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
- Anna Diamond v. Eighth Avenue 92, L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.