Legal Opinion

Dike v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1999No. 98-254PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant William Dike appeals from the judgment and sentence that was entered after a jury found him guilty of aggravated assault and battery.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Dike presents several issues for our review:

ISSUE I

Did the state fail to prove that William Dike committed aggravated assault since he did not use a “deadly weapon?”

ISSUE II

Did the trial court deprive William Dike of his due process right to a fair trial by failing to instruct the jury on the elements of aggravated assault?

ISSUE III

Did the trial court err by allowing unfairly prejudicial evidence to be introduced at trial,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Rasmussen v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1897

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Shey Elan BruceWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Robinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API