Salazar v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*958OPINION
DICE, Judge.
The conviction is for rape; the punishment, fifty years.
Appellant’s sole ground of error is that the court erred in failing to grant his motion for a mistrial after he was asked by state’s counsel in the jury’s presence if he had been convicted of a certain felony offense — which at the time was not a final conviction, being then on appeal to this court.
While testifying on cross-examination, appellant was asked the question and the following transpired:
“Q Mr. Salazar, isn’t it a fact that you have been convicted of the offense of Ex-convict in possession of firearms?
“Mr.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ringer Ringer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Cohron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Jennings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fentis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Waller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Bucklin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1982
- Fentis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.