Legal Opinion
Mullen v. . Canal Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 5, 1894Published
1Opinion of the Court
This is a petition to rehear a case in which the opinion was filed last term, 114 N.C. 8. It does not appear that it was decided hastily, nor that any material point of fact or law, or any direct authority, was overlooked. The petition must, therefore, be dismissed. Hudson v. Jordan,110 N.C. 250, and cases cited in Clark's Code (2 Ed.), 712.
Petition dismissed.
Cited: Weisel v. Cobb, 122 N.C. 70; Hodgin v. Bank, 125 N.C. 503,511.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mullen v. Norfolk & Carolina Canal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Hudson v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Hodgin v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Cowan v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898