Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtPariente, J.
The issue in this case is whether the trial court properly applied strict scrutiny when reviewing the Mandatory Delay Law, which imposes an additional twenty-four hour waiting period on women seeking to terminate their pregnancies. See ch. 2015-118 § 1, Laws of Fla. (codified at § 390.0111(3), Fla. Stat. (2015)) (“Mandatory Delay Law”). The Mandatory Delay Law implicates the Florida Constitution’s express right of privacy. In Florida, any law that implicates the fundamental right of privacy, regardless of the activity, is subject to strict scrutiny and, therefore, presumptively…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gonzales v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and Jill Meadows v. Kimberly K. Reynolds ex rel. State of Iowa and Iowa Board of MedicineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Emma Gayle Weaver, etc. v. Stephen C. Myers, M.D.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
- State of Florida, Department of Health v. Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Wrigley v. RomanickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- City of Miami v. City of Miami Firefighters' and Police Officers' Retirement Trust & PlanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.