Legal Opinion

Lorscher v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Honor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Berrien. (O'Hara, J.) Assumpsit for benefit insurance. Defendant brings error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinions.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Missouri. The object of the corporation is stated in section 2 of the certificate of ■organization, as follows:

“Sec. 2. The objects of the corporation shall be to unite fraternally all acceptable white men of every profession, business, and occupation; to give all possible and material aid in its power to its members, and those ■depending on its members, by holding moral, instructivo, .and scientific lectures, by encouraging each other in business, and by assisting each other to obtain employment; and to promote benevolence…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Supreme Lodge Knights & Ladies of HonorMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Knights of Maccabees of the World v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Wood v. Brotherhood of American YeomenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Home Forum Benefit Order v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Sterling v. Head Camp, Pacific Jurisdiction, Woodmen of the WorldUtah Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API