Legal Opinion

Home Forum Benefit Order v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Oklahoma County. This case is brought up from Oklahoma county by the appellant to reverse a judgment obtained by the appellee in the sum of $2,000 and interest. The case arose out out of a claim for life assurance. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dale, O. J.:

The district court of Oklahoma county, on October 16, 1896, rendered a judgment in favor of Lizzie Jones and against the Home Forum Benefit Order in the sum of $2,000, principal, and $133.50, interest. The suit upon which the judgment was rendered was based upon an alleged contract of life assurance, which contract was entered into, as claimed, between one John Jones, husband of Lizzie Jones, and this appellant. The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, and in as much as this case must largely be determined upon the facts as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. KnightIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Insurance Company v. MahoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Insurance Co. v. Young's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Bauer v. Samson LodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Commonwealth v. WetherbeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Modern Brotherhood of America v. BesharaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Head Camp Woodmen of the World v. SlossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. King v. Farmers Electric Coop., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Sterling v. Head Camp, Pacific Jurisdiction, Woodmen of the WorldUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  5. American Insurance Union v. CowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API