Legal Opinion

Bogartz v. Astor

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMichael F. Walsh, J.

Aaron Bogartz, infant plaintiff herein, had been awarded double compensation against Arcy Doll & Toy Manufacturing Company, his employer, under section 14-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, half of which was paid by the employer and half by the insurance carrier. Bogartz then started this third-party action against Vincent Astor, the owner of the building in which he was employed. The plaintiff and *159the defendant agreed upon a settlement. Both the employer and the carrier filed notices of liens against the proceeds of the settlement under section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

On July…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Geneva v. . HensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Bunker v. LangsNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Lefevre v. LarawayNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Ward v. . RoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Sproule v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KummerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Revona Realty Corp. v. WassermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  3. Gray v. DrozeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API