Legal Opinion

Kaliski v. Bacot

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 12, 2003No. Docket No. 01-9470PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge.'

Plaintiff-Appellants Mildred and Edward Kaliski (“the Kaliskis”) brought this shareholder derivative action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Denny Chin, Judge), alleging that certain officers and directors of the Bank of New York (“BONY”) committed systematic wrongs when they sought to expand BONY’s banking business in Russia in the early and mid-1990’s. In particular, the Kaliskis claim that BONY’s ill-advised expansion into the Russian banking industry was riddled with unlawful tactics including, tax evasion, money…

2Cases cited14 opinions

Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
Comer v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
Abramson v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
Gallup v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

In Re: Bank of New York Derivative Litigation. Mildred Kaliski and Edward J. Kaliski, Rita Hochenbaum and Rochelle Phillips, Charles H. Beck, on Behalf of the Bank of New York Company, Inc. Consolidated-Plaintiff v. J. Carter Bacot, Gerald L. Hassell, Deno D. Papageorge, Alan R. Griffith, Thomas A. Renyi, John A. Luke, Jr., William R. Chaney, William C. Richardson, Catherine Rein, Richard Barth and Donald L. Miller, the Bank of New York Company, Inc. And the Bank of New York, Nominal-Defendants-Appellees, Sergei Kotov and Vladimir GalitzineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003