Legal Opinion

Thompson v. H.W.G. Group, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 6, 1995No. 93-859PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The plaintiffs, Joan L. and Alfred H. Thompson, Jr., brought an action against the defendants alleging, inter alia, that the defendants had violated RSA 356-B:65, I (1984), a provision of the New Hampshire Condominium Act; and RSA 358-A:2 (1984 & Supp. 1994), the consumer protection statute. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs on the violation of RSA 356-B:65, I, but the Superior Court (Smukler, J.) found that the defendants had not violated RSA358-A:2. The plaintiffs appealed, arguing that a violation of RSA 356-B:65,1, is, as a matter of law, a violation of RSA 358-A:2.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hydraform Products Corp. v. American Steel & Aluminum Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Broderick v. WattsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. Ashuelot Savings Bank v. AlbeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bronson v. Hitchcock ClinicSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. Carlisle v. Frisbie Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. Emerson v. BentwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  4. Rood v. MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. Derry & Webster v. BayviewDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API