Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Peach

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1976No. 75-278Published

1Concurrence

Mr. JUSTICE ALLOY,

specially concurring:

I believe that the provisions of section 5 — 6—4(h) of the Unified Code of Corrections (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 1005 — 6—4(h)) should only be construed prospectively.

The trial court erroneously applied this section in considering sentencing of defendant Peach.

Since the amendment with which we are concerned in this case increases the punishment for an offense as compared with the existing provision, that amendment would be unconstitutional for such reason. (People v. Taylor (1974), 21 Ill. App. 3d 702, 315 N.E.2d 914; People v. McKinney (1968),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Dyer v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. The PEOPLE v. McKinneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API