Legal Opinion

Gantt v. Selph

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 30, 2018No. Appellate Case 2016-002134; Opinion 27807PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE JAMES :

In this case, the circuit court ruled Appellant Kim Murphy was not qualified to be a candidate for election to a Richland County seat on the District 5 Richland-Lexington School Board of Trustees (School Board). The circuit court based this ruling on its conclusion that Murphy resides in Lexington County. We first hold the circuit court had subject matter jurisdiction over Respondents' declaratory judgment action challenging *525 Murphy's qualifications. Second, we hold there is probative evidence in the record supporting the circuit court's conclusion that Murphy resides in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Dema v. Tenet Physician Services-Hilton Head, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Bank of Babylon v. QuirkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Porter v. Labor DepotCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  5. South Carolina Public Interest Foundation v. Judicial Merit Selection CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. S.C. Republican PartySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Vanessa Williams v. Bradford Q. Jeffcoat, Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API