Legal Opinion

City of Elizabethton v. Sluder

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1976PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

This is a tort action based upon electrical injuries wherein the controlling question is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court therein. The jury awarded re spondents verdicts totalling $75,000.00, and they were upheld by the Court of Appeals, with one judge dissenting.

We affirm.

I

Respondent sustained serious and disabling injuries as a result of an electrical shock received while working on top of a railroad car located generally under high tension lines of the Elizabethton Electric System. He was engaged in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Melody v. HamblinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  2. Odum v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  3. City of Chattanooga v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Phelps v. Magnavox Company of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  5. Bray v. Blue Ridge Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. McCall v. WilderTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. McClenahan v. CooleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Roberts v. Robertson County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  5. Leonard Plating Co. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API