Legal Opinion
State v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 6, 1946No. 34,209PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Justice.
The state brought action against defendant railway company to recover certain claimed penalties. Defendant answered. Plaintiff interposed separate demurrers to paragraphs III and V of the answer on the ground that neither stated facts sufficient to constitute a defense. The court overruled the demurrers and certified the questions presented as important and doubtful. The appeal is from that order.
This is one of six actions brought by the state, through.its attorney general, pursuant to Minn. St. 1941, §§ 219.68 2 and 219.74 3 (Mason St. 1927, §§ 4926, 4930), against certain…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- State v. TennysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Judd v. LandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Benson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Yaeger v. Delano Granite WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- McClelland v. McClellandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. ElamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Alaska Public Utilities Commission v. Chugach Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.