Legal Opinion
Bernardo v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 2004No. D040186, D040866PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, Acting P. J.
Agnes Bernardo, Pamela Colip and Saundra Dufify-Hawkins (collectively, Bernardo) brought suit for injunctive relief against Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) and Planned Parenthood of San Diego and Riverside Counties (PPSDRC) (together Planned Parenthood) under California’s unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) and false advertising law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17500 et seq.). Bernardo alleged that PPFA’s and PPSDRC’s Internet Web sites (<http://www.plannedparenthood.org.html> and <http://www.planned.org.html>, respectively) contained…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Progressive West Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Hylton v. Frank E. Rogozienski, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Alch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- McGarry v. University of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.