Legal Opinion
VIOLETTE v. CITI BANK
District Court, D. Maine
Decided May 4, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00477Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE GREGORY PAUL VIOLETTE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Docket no. 1:20-cv-00477-GZS ) CITIBANK N.A., ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER REMANDING CASE Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) filed by Defendant Citibank N.A. (“CNBA”),1 which seeks dismissal of pro se Plaintiff Gregory Paul Violette’s Complaint (ECF No. 11-2, PageID #s 42–43). Having reviewed the Motion, the related memoranda filed by both parties (ECF Nos. 13 & 14), along with the entire docket, the Court concludes that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this removed matter.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Bell v. Preferred Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.