Legal Opinion

Burtus v. M'Carty

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1816PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The suit- on the recognisance of bail must be brought in the county where the original suit was commenced'. In Davis v, Gillet, (7 Johns. Rep. 318.,) the bail had removed out off the county, so that they could not be there personally served with process* In Haswell v. Bates & Lewis, (9 Johns. .Rep, 80.,) which was an action on a bail.-bopd taken in a court' of common pleas, the bail also resided out of the county; and in Gardiner v. Buchan & Olcott (12 Johns. Rep. 459.,) which was also an action, on-a bail-bond,; the principal; resided, out of the ,county, though the bail lived within-tile…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. PackardSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Wood v. ComanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Braithwaite v. JordanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Lowther v. LawrenceOhio Supreme Court · 1833
  5. People ex rel. Works v. Judges of the Court of Common PleasNew York Supreme Court · 1823

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API