Legal Opinion

Vigil v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 18, 1975No. 1 CA-IC 1197PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NELSON, Presiding Judge.

This case involves the validity of a settlement entered into by an injured workman and the insurance carrier for his employer prior to a determination of compensability by The Industrial Commission of Arizona (Commission) when the issue of compensability was seriously disputed by the parties. The authority of the Commission to approve such settlements was confirmed by this Court in Gray v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, Ariz.App., 539 P. 2d 973 (1975), and the rationale in that case is controlling here. The award is affirmed.

James B. Vigil (Vigil) was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doby v. Miami Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Brigham Young University v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Gray v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Kinney v. LundyArizona Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Doyle v. Old Dominion Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Luke's Hosp., cna/insurance v. Indus. Com'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. Pacific Western Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Vigil v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. St. Luke's Hosp., cna/insurance v. Indus. Com'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API